35 Comments
User's avatar
AMV's avatar

Why would they want to heal us? They don’t. They want to control and manage our health expensively for their profit. Is cure even a word to them? “Do No Harm” is silent. Sickening and evil 🤢👿.

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

NIH affirms Ivermectin's use against cancer. But that does not mean it is useful against COVID. One does not necessarily follow the other. If there are no studies about its effectiveness against COVID, there should be just to clear up any confusion. If it finds no effectiveness against COVID, that, too, should be communicated widely. Fair is fair.

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

My goodness there are many studies all over the world demonstrating ivermectin’s effectiveness against Covid. Uttar Pradesh state in India distributed it to everyone in the state and totally wiped out Covid. Other states in India that did not had huge problems. Of course all this information is hidden by big tech so unless you know where to find the data you would not know this. The CDC ivermectin study was a joke. It was designed to fail. Given too late and in doses well above the very well known safe levels. CDC terminated the study early because of side effects. Yet CDC ignores all the side effects of the gene therapy and continues to push it despite the fact it is not effective. CDC NIH FDA all totally captured by industries they are supposed to regulate. Nothing to see here.

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

The country of India dropping it from clinical guidance is NOT the same thing as what a state is actually doing. Kind of like Florida not following all the stupid guidelines coming from the federal government during Covid. Uttar Pradesh knew it worked and kept using it, choosing the health of their people over pharma profits and WEF & WHO agendas. The linked article just demonstrates the ICMR is just as corrupt and morally bankrupt as our CDC, NIH, FDA, etc.

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Here’s what I’ve found in my research. Ivermectin’s use is for worms. It CAN work against COVID but has very bad side effects.

Curiously, face masks have no side effects.

We’re done. I have no use for this. Be well.

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

You have bad info. Ivermectin has been used for years to treat many viral illnesses. It has virtually no side effects if used within well recognized dosage limits. The corrupt CDC study on ivermectin was designed to fail by overdosing.

Do some more research on masks. They have been shown to reduce oxygen levels and also concentrate viral loads. Very unhealthy. Unless you wear N95, masks are useless at stopping aerosol viral particles. Masks are as safe and effective as the gene therapy they tried to put in everyone’s arm.

Also studies have demonstrated mask have ruined kids as they have been deprived of non-verbal communication they desperately need.

You will not learn any of this using Google as they suppressed real information and directed searches to CDC BS.

God bless. I am done here also.

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

The CDC was not my research venue. Goodbye.

Expand full comment
Steph's avatar

Face masks do have side effects. Negative side effects.

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Okay, list them. And give the sources.

Expand full comment
AgainsttheLies's avatar

Uh, I think there are MULTIPLE studies showing its effectiveness against Covid.

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Name them, show them, show their standards of procedure and whether repeating their protocols have given the results they profess. Without any of that, you have no argument.

Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

There is no covid. Influensa disappeared in WHO case counts in 2020. Do the math

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Thank for your input. We disagree. Be well.

Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

Are you Royalty!?! The only person I know that refer to herself as "we" is the former Queen of Denmark, Margrethe II. 😁 Or maybe you have multiple personalities, who knows.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

Thank you for clearing that up, I actually misunderstood her. Anyways, we are not the same. I don't know everything, but I am expanding my knowledge daily, I hope you are too. You want to believe factcheckers paid by industry, I wan't to believe independent researchers, who have seen through the mainstream propaganda. You are Blue pill, I am Red pill. When you are ready to open your eyes, we can talk.

Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

Who are we?

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Ignoring your hostility, you and I are we. And between the two of us, we are finished. Be well.

Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

I misunderstood you. I thought you were trying to speak for everyone to single me out. I am sorry, did not mean to be hostile at all. I was just shocked by the other comments from Miron about me being the reason people died. I wasn't reading your answer right. Yes, we can agree to disagree and I wish you well to.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

Really? Sort of when there where lockdowns and grandchildren were accused of killing their grandparents if they didn't stay six feet away and muzzled? Can you even Imagine the trauma and guilty those children must have IF their loved ones actually should die? From old age of kvaxines. My god! I thought substack was uncensored, but we have voluntary thoughtpolice right here! What the fudge? Are you aware that it's a fysical impossibity to make people die, by stating an opinion ?

Expand full comment
Ronjia's avatar

Show me the proof, that a "virus" was isolated from human being in vivo. Ever!

Expand full comment
CBG's avatar
Sep 6Edited

Here is an ongoing metaanalysis of the NUMEROUS evidence based studies showing ivermectin studies efficacy against Covid 19.. Each study is analyzed and charted . https://c19ivm.org/

Expand full comment
John K's avatar

On that news, don’t be surprised if another Ivermectin manufacturing facility mysteriously burns to the ground.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
John K's avatar

Why do you say that?

Ivermectin demonstrated to cure Covid and one of the major manufacturers of ivermectin mysteriously burns to the ground. Ivermectin threatened big pharma gene therapy jab cash cow - that is not taken lightly.

Now ivermectin reported to cure cancer threatening the big pharma cancer industry cash cow. Not too much of a stretch to think the other major ivermectin plant might have a mysterious fire soon.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 5
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
John K's avatar

I provide support for my positions and all you offer are personal attacks. Done with you troll.

Expand full comment
John Dolan's avatar

It seems I’ve fallen down a rabbit hole

Expand full comment
Diana Nehila's avatar

Really? Let's have some real world clinical studies on this "discovery". Over next in is used in the large animal veterinary profession, not in human medicine.

Expand full comment
Mike Warren's avatar

What’s the dose???

Expand full comment
Joanne Creager's avatar

Is there a link we can access to the actual study?

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

Google it.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Xuewu Liu's avatar

He reports daily that some have died, particularly from cancer, and then suggests that these deaths are related to COVID-19. This makes me feel that his reasoning is quite far-fetched.

Expand full comment